The Scientific Case Against Atom Bombism

Rodan or Atom Bomb?

ONCE again, dear reader, we beg you to indulge your Curmudgeon as we engage in a bit of parody. Having observed the chicanery of creationists, we have learned that their style of argument can be applied to virtually anything. Behold, our refutation of the theory of the atomic bomb — Atom Bombism:

1. Atomic theory is “just a theory.”

2. No one has ever seen an atom, and certainly not one that explodes.

3. The second law of thermodynamics prohibits atom bombs.

4. There are no atom bombs mentioned in the bible — not even atoms!

5. Even if individual atoms decay, that’s micro-fission. There’s no proof of macro-fission.

6. Atomic theory destroys family values. It leads to fear, depression, sexual promiscuity, homosexuality, divorce, and other forms of amoral, animalistic behavior.

7. There is no evidence that a so-called atom bomb destroyed Hiroshima.

8. Just because a so-called atom bomb was dropped when Hiroshima blew up proves nothing. Correlation does not equal causality. That city could have been destroyed a volcano, or an earthquake, or some other act of God.

9. Many respected scientists believe that Hiroshima was destroyed by an encounter with Rodan, but they don’t speak out publicly for fear of being Expelled.

10. Rodan’s existence is well-documented and has never been disproved.

11. Atom Bombism is the product of materialism and a Godless, naturalistic worldview.

12. It takes more faith to believe in Atom Bombism than it does to believe in the Tooth Fairy.

13. Atom Bombism is a theory in crisis! More and more scientists are abandoning Atom Bombism because they know it isn’t supported by evidence. In ever-increasing numbers they are turning to RT — Rodan Theory.

Atomic explosion or Rodan? “Teach the controversy!”

[For previous posts in this series, see: The Scientific Case Against Craterism, and then The Scientific Case Against Powered Flight, and we'll toss in Two Plus Two Equals Three.]

Want more? See: The Scientific Case Against Darwinian Emancipation.

Copyright © 2010. The Sensuous Curmudgeon. All rights reserved.

add to del.icio.usAdd to Blinkslistadd to furlDigg itadd to ma.gnoliaStumble It!add to simpyseed the vineTailRankpost to facebook

. AddThis Social Bookmark Button . Permalink for this article

31 responses to “The Scientific Case Against Atom Bombism

  1. I saw Rodan when I was a kid and it scared the hell out of me.

    I’ve been good ever since.

    Srsly, it’s twue.

  2. Gabriel Hanna

    I certainly hope that proponents of the Mothra theory and the Rodan theory can put aside their differences under a big tent, which can more effectively combat the materialist atomic theory.

    Of course the Rodanites, by denying Mothra, are still going to hell, but we will refrain from criticizing your position in public, unless we are accused of being Rodanites ourselves.

  3. What nonsense! Everyone knows Godzilla theory is the truth.

  4. Doc Bill says:

    I saw Rodan when I was a kid and it scared the hell out of me.

    Was that before or after you were abducted and probed by aliens in a UFO?

  5. EastwoodDC

    >The second law of thermodynamics prohibits atom bombs.

    Of course it does. You’d never get that perfect mushroom-cloud shape just through random rearrangement of molecules. If you doubt this is possible, how is it there are MUTANTS + RADIOACTIVE ZOMBIES ??

    @Doc Bill: For me, it was The Blob, which instilled in me an irrational fear of Steve McQueen. ;-)

  6. Godzillianity is the one and true religion. Has he ever been defeated by His enemies and hasn’t He been resurrected many times?

  7. How come the atom-bombists claim that energy is released by the fission of uranium and by the fusion of hydrogen? They can’t make up their mind whether it’s splitting or combining that produces energy!

  8. For my next post, I’ve got one even crazier. I’ll do one claiming the moon landings are a fraud. Oh, wait …

  9. From chapter one:

    God has decreed that mankind must move onward and upward to a much higher plane of intelligence than heretofore reached. Lawsonomy is the means by which mankind can reach that higher plane.

    I’ll leave it there. You’re my Lawsonomy expert.

  10. I’m speechless. All of this has just blown me away.

  11. I knew a teacher who taught a couple of generations of students that #1 is the case.

    According to the teacher, atoms cannot exist because the nucleus with all of those positive charges would fly apart instead of sticking together.

  12. Cheryl Shepherd-Adams says:

    … atoms cannot exist because the nucleus with all of those positive charges would fly apart instead of sticking together.

    Hey, that’s a good point!

  13. According to the teacher, atoms cannot exist because the nucleus with all of those positive charges would fly apart instead of sticking together.

    Obviously never heard of Gorilla gluons!

  14. this is one of the best Threads ever and it is a very valid argument.

    Those of us that worship Rodan, know that he is the one and only truth. Godzilla is just a Rodan wannabe. Any Diety worth his salt would be able to fly.

    The Texas SBOE have Removed Godzilla from the history books and his likeness will not be known by the new generation of Texans.

    MRBY

    Sam

    (May Rodan Bless You )

  15. You have the right attitude, SamF. Fear of Rodan is the beginning of wisdom.

  16. Hey, I know that Lawsonomy place. You can see the words “Study Natural Law” painted on the roof of their barn from I-43.

  17. Oops. Make that I-41/94.

    The Lawsonomy page has added a lot of content since last I looked … and it’s Grade AA wackaloonery. What a surprize! ;-)

  18. I don’t get the idea that a nucleus would fly apart because of all the positive charges. Aren’t they held together by strings?

  19. Tundra Boy asks: “Aren’t they [ptotons] held together by strings?”

    It’s the Unnatural Force.

  20. Neither Rodan or Godzilla would stand a chance against the great Gamera!
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamera
    Need more proof?

  21. retiredsciguy

    Curmy sez, “Atomic explosion or Rodan? “Teach the controversy!””

    Hey, wait a minute!! Wasn’t it the atomic explosions over Japan that gave rise to Rodan? Or was that Godzilla? Or maybe both?

    If that’s the case, no atomic explosion = no Rodan!

  22. Who is this Godzilla of whom you speak? Are you referring to GOJIRA???

    http://hubpages.com/hub/Gojira-Japans-First-Giant-Monster-Film

    Blasphemers!!!!!!!!

  23. perhaps the vatican would like to test this theory at their place?

  24. Won’t anyone speak up for the giant flying turtle with the rocket engine up his *ss?

  25. Don’t leave out the Koran:
    http://www.articlesbase.com/religion-articles/quran-phenomenally-characterizes-the-atomic-hell-539537.html

    And Baha’u’llah said, “Split the atom’s heart, and lo! Within it thou wilt find a sun.” (Valleys of Search and of Knowledge)

    See??? See????

  26. Hey, if atomic theory says that atoms explode, and we are surrounded by atoms, why aren’t they exploding right NOW? Huh, huh, HUH?!

  27. Albanaeon asks:

    … why aren’t they exploding right NOW? Huh, huh, HUH?!

    Like the persistence of monkeys, it’s an abominable mystery.

  28. Tomato Addict

    … why aren’t they exploding right NOW? Huh, huh, HUH?!

    Once all atoms exploded, but since the fall they only decay.

  29. Biokid says:

    I’m speechless. All of this has just blown me away.

    Wait ’til you see the next one in the series. I may post it this coming weekend.