AIG Ain’t No Kin To No Monkey

The website PhysOrg reports New research suggests apes have human-like personalities. They say:

For as long as people have coexisted with other animals, they have debated amongst themselves whether some animals have some of the same personality traits as humans or if it’s just anthropomorphism at work. Many believe dogs, for example, have unique personalities, e.g. a cranky disposition, laziness, or even signs of neuroticism. More recently researchers have argued over whether apes, which of course are much closer to us in most ways, are able to feel the things we feel and whether they have different personalities between them, as we people do, and if so, if they are like ours.

Now new research by an international team of psychologists and animal research scientists may have settled the issue once and for all. In their paper published in the journal Animal Behavior, the team says that their study shows that yes, some apes do display different kinds of personality traits, and that chimpanzees in particular have some that are very nearly the same as us humans.

Here’s a link to the paper: All too human? Chimpanzee and orang-utan personalities are not anthropomorphic projections. The PhysOrg article summarizes the methods used in the study and then concludes:

This, the research team says, shows that chimpanzees really do have distinct personalities, and more importantly, that they are very nearly the same as ours.

We don’t know what to make of such research, but we know who does — Answers in Genesis (AIG), one of the major sources of young-earth creationist wisdom. AIG is the online creationist ministry of Ken Ham (ol’ Hambo), the Australian entrepreneur who has become the ayatollah of Appalachia.

Here’s what we found in AIG’s News to Note, May 26, 2012 — “A weekly feature examining news from the biblical viewpoint.” It’s the first item at their news summary, titled “Psychologists say observations of chimpanzee and orangutan behavior in zoos support the primates’ evolutionary relationship to people.”

AIG discusses a writeup of the same research described above that they found in Nature News, and then they give us their unique commentary. Here are some excerpts, with bold font added by us:

Evolutionists claim genetic similarities between primates and humans are the results of common ancestry. Biblical creationists — and even intelligent design proponents of other persuasions — understand genetic similarities as the natural result of having a common Designer.

Did you get that? Creationists and intelligent design “theorists” claim that the genetic similarities between us and our primate cousins isn’t due to evolution. It’s because we all have a common designer. Let’s read on:

Furthermore, much circular reasoning and bias are built even into the claims of genetic similarity. God’s own Word tells us that He made Adam and Eve in His own image on the sixth day of Creation week, the same day He made land animals.

No circular reasoning or bias there! We continue:

Our Creator has made it clear therefore that there is no evolutionary relationship between apes and humans.

It’s clear — clear! Here’s more:

To consider the human surveys of animal behavior in any setting — much less the unnatural setting of zoos — evidence in support of an evolutionary tree of unverifiable past events while rejecting the eyewitness account provided by the Creator of the universe seems to represent the height of elevating man’s fallible opinions over the Word of the infallible omniscient God.

You should be ashamed of yourself, dear reader. You’ll never understand anything until you abandon your fallible mind. Here’s AIG’s conclusion, with scripture references omitted:

Using such anthropomorphic games to continue justifying the replacement of the Creator by evolution represents a denial of truth that every person — according to God’s Word — knows in his heart. Scripture teaches in [references] that every person understands he is morally accountable to his Creator no matter how much he suppresses that truth.

So there you are. Who are you going to believe — those godless researchers or scripture? The choice is yours.

Copyright © 2012. The Sensuous Curmudgeon. All rights reserved.

add to del.icio.usAdd to Blinkslistadd to furlDigg itadd to ma.gnoliaStumble It!add to simpyseed the vineTailRankpost to facebook

. AddThis Social Bookmark Button . Permalink for this article

11 responses to “AIG Ain’t No Kin To No Monkey

  1. So, rather than the similarities between humans and chimps being a matter of mere natural processes, common descent, and such, they are a result of purposeful actions by God (or maybe just intelligent designers) or maybe just limitations on what God could do with the material He was given to work with.

  2. That’s right, TomS. You ain’t no kin to no monkey, but you were deliberately designed like one.

  3. aturingtest

    “Furthermore, much circular reasoning and bias are built even into the claims of genetic similarity. God’s own Word. tells us that He made Adam and Eve in His own image on the sixth day of Creation week, the same day He made land animals.”
    There should be some kind of (earthly) award for that sort of massive self-awareness fail.

  4. Who What are you going to believe — those godless researchers your own lying eyes or scripture?”
    There. Fixed that for you.

  5. AiG: “Evolutionists claim genetic similarities between primates and humans are the results of common ancestry.”

    The ONLY way to respond to that is “Go whine to Behe. He also thinks that, and he doesn’t have ‘evolutionist’s’ prior commitment to (methodological) naturalism, so he might take you seriously. Though he still won’t buy your young-earth nonsense.”

  6. I always hear that God made man in his own image. Does that mean God had a penis? If so what did he use it for? How big was it? These are really deep questions for the Theologians.

  7. craigshearer

    You’d think that if God had made all creatures, he would have had the foresight to realise that one day humans would wonder why we look (and behave) so much like apes.

  8. I re-read this post, seeing how Ken pretty much skipped past the point of the research. And then such poor writing, certainly not persuasive.

  9. Biblical creationists — and even intelligent design proponents of other persuasions — understand genetic similarities as the natural result of having a common Designer.

    Or perhaps the Creator Designer is just really lazy and unimaginative. He got bored after making half a million species of beetles.

  10. b2blogcom: “And then such poor writing, certainly not persuasive.”

    But it’s plenty persuasive to his target audience, to reinforce what they already believe. The more educated evolution deniers don’t buy it, but they don’t like to criticize it either, often saying: “what’s the harm, let them believe.” Those folks have the Discoveroids to feed them the more sophisticated nonsense that they crave.

  11. If there is some divine purpose to our being designed to be like monkeys, does that mean that we should try to follow the divine plan and act like monkeys?

    On the other hand, I know that if I found out that my great-grandfather were a horse thief, I would feel no obligation to steal horses. (Fortunately, for I don’t know what I would do with a horse if I stole one.)