Creationist Wisdom #289: Christmas & Creationism

Today’s letter-to-the-editor appears at the website NJ.com, the online home for several New Jersey newspapers. It may be a column and not a letter, but we’ll treat it as if it were a letter because it seems to fit the type. The thing is titled How Christmas supports Intelligent Design.

This is so goofy and incoherent that we’ll give you fewer excerpts than usual, but they’ll be enhanced with our Curmudgeonly commentary, and some bold font for emphasis. As we usually do, we’ll omit the writer’s name and city. Okay, here we go:

Now that Christmas has come and gone, and some folks have a few days off until New Year’s, perhaps we have time to leisurely consider the real meaning of Christmas.

Please, not that. We’ve already seen enough sermons. Ah, things suddenly look promising:

I’m talking, of course, about how Christmas supports both Intelligent Design and Creation Science.

BWAHAHAHAHAHA! This is going to be good. Let’s read on … but we’re going to skip several paragraphs about the “true” meaning of Christmas, ending with:

As the biblical text says, “The Word became flesh and dwelt among us.” Let’s try, just for a moment, to wrap our minds around this utterly astonishing assertion.

We’re trying. Skipping some more sermon-like material, we get to the good stuff:

How does all this relate to Intelligent Design? From a scientific perspective, supporters of Intelligent Design remind us that there are no repeatable examples in nature of random chance producing highly complex structures. They point out that outside intelligence is always required to produce such complex structures.

Yes, so they say. And yet, hurricanes are complex structures, but somehow we see them every year. Planetary systems are also complex structures, but the galaxy seems to have a lot of them. Galaxies are complex too, and there are billions of those. Anyway, the letter continues:

For biblical believers, the identity of that intelligent designer is pretty clear: the God of the Bible. As we are reminded by the world around us, that Creator has intervened in the world in a remarkable way.

That’s true. And that’s precisely why it’s so devilishly difficult to treat the subject as a science. Here’s more:

Now, if the biblical account of Christmas is to be believed, God intervened in humanity in a still more astonishing way. Without letting go of his divinity, God, in the person of Jesus Christ, became a human being. The same God who created the Earth, the Sun, the farthest stars and who invented whales, sunflowers and people, took on flesh and became that infant human being in first-century Palestine.

Wow. That utterly boggles the mind.

It does indeed. Moving along:

As remarkable as the Genesis creation account is, what happened there is small potatoes compared to what happened in Bethlehem 2,000 years ago. Of course God created the world. Pretty impressive, but that’s what you might expect God to do. (That is, unless you believe we’re all just the product of chance.) God is the creator, after all.

Where is the letter-writer going with this mess? Hang on, it’s coming. But first we have to skip some more sermon stuff. The stunning revelation is in the final paragraph:

If we truly believe and understand the implications of the Christmas story, we then start to understand the astonishing assertion that God intervened in the world by becoming a human being. After that, it’s pretty straightforward to believe that God supernaturally intervened to create the world.

Aha! Now we understand. If you believe in Christmas, you should have no problem at all believing in creationism. In for a penny, in for a pound, and vice versa.

Copyright © 2012. The Sensuous Curmudgeon. All rights reserved.

add to del.icio.usAdd to Blinkslistadd to furlDigg itadd to ma.gnoliaStumble It!add to simpyseed the vineTailRankpost to facebook

. AddThis Social Bookmark Button . Permalink for this article

8 responses to “Creationist Wisdom #289: Christmas & Creationism

  1. “For biblical believers, the identity of that intelligent designer is pretty clear: the God of the Bible.”

    Surely the Dishonesty Institute would admonish this writer for letting the cat out of the bag. To think that someone would actually connect the dots from ID to God, indeed.

  2. Charley Horse

    It seems the writer is also an NRA spokesperson.
    Or so it seems in another recent article written by him.
    He really has a problem with reality.

    http://blog.nj.com/njv_george_berkin/2012/12/just_days_after_the_connecticu.html

    …….We teach our children that humans are nothing more than advanced animals, and not made in the “image of God,” as creationists maintain. Why are we then surprised when some young people act as though so-called divinely ordained moral rules don’t apply? As they say in biology class, it’s all about survival of the fittest.

    If our society is determined to remove any public mention of biblical religion, why are we surprised when some young people conclude that God’s rules have nothing to do with how they should behave?……

    For him, I’m sure, his god approves the manufacture and
    dissemination of weapons of mass destruction. Jesus’s
    weapon of choice would be one with a banana clip.

  3. Charley Horse

    If the universe could manage to do what it does
    during the time its supposedly manager was a human….
    not a god…then it just stands to reason…ahem…
    that once the god lit the fuse causing the big bang,
    the god was no longer needed. The universe does
    very well, thank you.

    Events and lack of any evidence today of that god
    who supposedly lit the fuse, suggests it was destroyed
    during the explosion.

  4. We teach our children that humans are nothing more than advanced animals

    As the ID advocates say, our bodies are purposefully designed to be like chimps and other apes.

    Rather than the similarity being just a consequence of common descent.

    Just because my great-uncle was a horse-thief, that doesn’t mean that I should be one too. But if God wanted me to be like my great-uncle, I might think about it.

  5. Yes, the article’s conclusions are intutiively obvious. To a creationist.
    The rest of us are just amused.

  6. The guy who wrote the “Christmas proves intelligent design” article has written 594 total blog articles for NJVoice. Truly, a self published genius,
    he says guns don’t kill people !, is a staunch staunch Voter ID, anti gun control, birther/partisan proponent of the serious kind.
    It follows that ID creationism is a serious hobby / scientific pursuit for him.
    He is definitely SBOE material and is painfully seeking recognition for his prescient views on science and the political arena. Disraeli would have made him an assistant minister,,,,,,of paperclip monitoring.
    Deep, deep guy. Thanks for sharing SC. I feel good now.

  7. Hey! It just occurred to me — if The Intelligent Designer designed Himself to be human flesh (Jesus), why did He go to all the trouble of being an Infant, then a young Boy, an Adolescent, and finally an Adult? Why didn’t He just make Himself into a grown Man in the first place? That way, He could start taking His message and doing His miracles to the people immediately.

    I capitalized all references to The Intelligent Designer intentionally, so there will be no misunderstanding concerning Who the DI is speaking of when they mention “The Intelligent Designer.”

  8. Intelligent design is to creation science what Santa is to Christmas.

    Both are made made up marketing campaigns.