You’re familiar with the creationist comics of Jack Chick, which you can read online from the links in this post: Creationist Comic Books. Chick is the purveyor extraordinaire of the most mindless, theologically primitive version of raw, young-earth creationism that can be found anywhere. If you haven’t yet seen them, you really should. They’re classics — especially Big Daddy?
Because Chick is the world’s greatest theologian, philosopher, illustrator, communicator, and creationist, this morning we were examining his newsletter, Battle Cry. In that majestic repository of creationist lore we came upon this new article: Basic Questions Evolutionists Can’t Answer.
It’s written by Thomas Heinze. He’s obviously a favorite of Chick’s, because his work has appeared there before. The last time we told you about one of his essays was A Test To Disprove Evolution. Let’s waste no more time on introductions. Here are some excerpts, with bold font added by us:
Evolutionists wake up each morning to tiptoe around important problems their worldview won’t let them resolve. Here are three basic examples:
Got your attention, huh? Okay, here are three problems you try to avoid:
Matter: where did everything come from? Evolutionists generally follow the atheists in saying: “From the Big Bang, an explosion.” They convince themselves that a made-up explosion called the Big Bang which exists only in their imagination was different from all explosions that people have actually observed.
Huh? The Big Bang wasn’t like all the other explosions we’ve seen? Let’s read on:
They think the Big Bang produced matter! Explosions that we observe don’t produce matter. Real estate people don’t drop bombs on houses to fix leaky roofs. Explosions don’t do anything like what evolutionists claim the Big Bang did.
Admit it, dear reader — you’ve been a fool! We continue to the next question:
Life: how did it start and how does it work? Evolutionists accept the atheist’s claim that some of the matter produced by the imagined big bang came together and made a living cell which then evolved becoming different kinds of cells, animals, and highly intelligent people like you.
Heinze has a few more paragraphs on that one, but we’ll skip that stuff so we can get to the third big question you’ve been tiptoeing around: Here it comes:
Sex: who came first — a him or a her? Which evolved first, male sex organs or female sex organs?
Gotcha! You can’t answer, can you? Let’s read some more:
Male sex organs are so different from female sex organs that neither could possibly have evolved from the other. Neither could either have evolved without the other! Think that through!
Think about it. Think deeply! While you’re doing that, Heinze continues:
Sexual reproduction could only have been successful if male and female organs fit one another and worked together at each stage from their very beginning. The only reasonable explanation is that both were created on purpose by an intelligent Creator.
This isn’t the first time Heinze has made that point. It seems to be very much on his mind. For his prior essay, see Jack Chick: Sex Is Evolution’s Nightmare You gotta admit — the guy has a winning argument. Here’s the climax of the article:
If there had been even one generation in which sexual reproduction was not already complete and functioning, those who believe that it gradually evolved would not even exist!
So there you are, dear reader. You want evidence for creationism? Then look down — it’s in your pants!
Copyright © 2012. The Sensuous Curmudgeon. All rights reserved.