Creationist Wisdom #329: “Just a Theory”

Today’s letter-to-the-editor appears in the Yuma Sun of Yuma, Arizona. The letter is titled Theory of evolution is just a theory. We’ll give you a few excerpts, enhanced with our Curmudgeonly commentary, and some bold font for emphasis. As we usually do we’ll omit the writer’s name and city. Okay, here we go:

I was raised in public schools being taught that people came from the deep blue. That by some anachronistic timetable and natural favor, we were led on a path to intelligence. We were told that there were data and data of empirical proof that these things happened.

The letter-writer must have slept through the lesson on evolution. He continues:

The truth is, there is not one book in the world that can show or catalog how one species can turn into another. In fact to the contrary, whenever one tries messing with the genome of a species, they die at an early age or become sick later in life because of the disorder caused by the tinkering.

Either he never heard of Genetic engineering and its beneficial applications, or whatever he may have learned comes from creationist sources. Let’s read on:

Even the stages of change printed in textbooks do not account for the fact that life on Earth, however many years ago, used to be more complex than it is now. It seems something happened in the past to make it harder for these complex species to exist. Nothing can explain this upside-down tree in the beginning of the timeline. Somehow things deteriorated.

Anyone know what he’s talking about? We don’t, but we want to hear more from this guy. Get this:

The “theory” of evolution will always be a theory for me. I just wish people were more open-minded about where they come from, not just accepting an idea born of sight, sound and touch.

Yes — don’t believe the evidence of your senses, even when it’s verified by the observations of others. Instead, one should be more open-minded and believe … what? Perhaps we’ll find out as we read some more:

Another concern is this. When did money, school and work become less personal than what you believe? Somehow, what I know to be true in my heart, like love and compassion, have no place in my working, learning and paying life?

What’s he saying — that his emotional state is more important than everything else in the world? Okay, if that works for him. Moving along:

All these things are connected. What we value, what we know, our passions and our beliefs. There is no other place for them except in our lives.

Huh? Well, he’s right — there’s no place for his passions except in his own life. They certainly have no place in constructing a scientific theory. Here’s now he concludes his letter:

Everything is personal. How can some things be less personal than others? Especially these things? These tangible amazing gifts. There really is no other place to put them. So please stop trying to take the ability to express them away.

That’s it? What did he say — that objective reality must yield to his emotions? We get the impression that the theory of evolution is a serious threat to his emotional life — which he regards as the most real and important thing in the world — far more important than something that is “just a theory.”

We never ran into this argument before, but it may be an interesting insight into what drives creationists to be the way they are.

Copyright © 2013. The Sensuous Curmudgeon. All rights reserved.

add to del.icio.usAdd to Blinkslistadd to furlDigg itadd to ma.gnoliaStumble It!add to simpyseed the vineTailRankpost to facebook

. AddThis Social Bookmark Button . Permalink for this article

9 responses to “Creationist Wisdom #329: “Just a Theory”

  1. jimroberts

    “I was raised in public schools being taught that people came from the deep blue.”
    That was in Sex-Ed – storks carry new people through the deep blue sky.

  2. I think what he’s saying is, he can’t appreciate the beauty of rainbows because scientists told him the spectrum is created by diffraction. Or something like that. It’s the old “science destroys the ability to feel emotions” argument. When I Heard the Learn’d Astronomer, O, his equations and maths disturbed my lovely dream ‘neath the tamarind tree. But expressed more stupidly.

    Cue Kermit the Frog with his banjo singing “The Rainbow Connection”: “The Lovers, the Dreamers, and Iiiii…”

  3. It sounds like he’s trying, and I emphasize “trying,” to use Johnathan Wells’ “all the major phyla appeared in the Cambrian” lie, this creationist is just not pulling it off very well.

  4. SC has it right, this guy feels objective reality should bow down to his emotions.

  5. Doctor Stochastic

    He probably is unfamiliar with corn, wheat, roses, orchids, etc.

  6. Doctor Stochastic

    And I forgot to mention Santa Gertrudis and Brangus.

  7. Doctor Stochastic says: “He probably is unfamiliar with corn”

    He doesn’t believe in corn. Please, don’t cause him any emotional distress.

  8. I suggest that Creationists find something to hang onto, because gravity is just a theory.

  9. “In fact to the contrary, whenever one tries messing with the genome of a species, they die at an early age or become sick later in life because of the disorder caused by the tinkering.”

    I think he is getting confused between genetic research, and the early animal cloning experiments where they did get those results.