Rev. David Rives: Two New Videos!

You can’t get enough of the brilliant and articulate leader of David Rives Ministries, can you? This is your lucky day, because the blaring sirens and flashing lights of the Drool-o-tron™ locked our computer onto his latest video, and the blinking letters of its wall display informed us that it’s posted at YouTube, so we could embed it here for your convenience.

It’s titled The Planet Saturn – I Won’t Be Moving! The rev provides a rapid-fire collection of facts that can be found in any high school text, but he emphasizes that Saturn is inhospitable to human life. Near the end he rushes through some stuff that suggests — to him — that Saturn isn’t an old planet, therefore … .

It’s the usual 90-second presentation, followed by a commercial. Go ahead, click on it. We know you can’t resist.

But wait — there’s more! The Drool-o-tron™ also informed us of yet another video of the rev’s — this one is at WorldNetDaily, so you’ll have to go there to see it.

You can find it here: World’s most powerful computer points to God. This one is really low-grade stuff. The “computer” is your brain, and it’s so complicated that it just couldn’t have evolved. It had to be designed!

As we always do with the rev’s videos, we dedicate the comments section for your use as an Intellectual Free Fire Zone. You know the rules. Okay, the comments are open. Go for it!

Copyright © 2014. The Sensuous Curmudgeon. All rights reserved.

add to del.icio.usAdd to Blinkslistadd to furlDigg itadd to ma.gnoliaStumble It!add to simpyseed the vineTailRankpost to facebook

. AddThis Social Bookmark Button . Permalink for this article

11 responses to “Rev. David Rives: Two New Videos!

  1. I think this Revver is well on the path of becoming a champion of Endarkenment values: Unreason, oppression, dogma, and the collection plate.

  2. Hey! David! Here is a clue. Is the location outside the mid-atmospheric level of the earth??? YES??? Than it aint hospitable to human life. Your idiot gawd did not design the universe for humans but for a totally different form of life, so yes if the incompetent designer does exist S/He/IT did all this for someone else. And only the earth for us, so we aint all that important to S/He/IT.

  3. On the last Rives cable show he had “paleontologist”Joe Taylor, who digs for fossils to prove Noah’s flood. Not being a real scientist able to get research grants he is also entrepreneurially sells castings of fossils he finds. I looked online to see if he was doing any damage to science and found an article about a mastodon skull “Lone Star” that got him out of hock enough to keep his museum afloat.

  4. Lewis Thomasonn

    I have been reading your blog for years but today was the first time that I tried to watch a video by the Rev. My first impression is that he is smarter than we think he is. His videos are for his following of basically scientifically illiterate people and he is letting them know that he is a real science guy.

  5. ” . . . he is letting them know that he is a real science guy.”

    You’re being snide, I hope.

  6. Nope, Dopey David is just as smart as I think he is – somewhere between a turnip and a cabbage.

  7. Dumb as he is, however, the rev has apparently figured out how to separate at least some of the droolers from their money. As cute and adorable as he looks in his bible boy suit, I love it when he puts on what he believes to be field clothes when he makes a video outside. A clown’s clown, that one.

  8. Unfortunately, the rubes who fall for this sort of stuff all vote. I’m not suggesting they shouldn’t be allowed to, but rather that those who don’t swallow it need to stand up and vote at least as energetically.

  9. Must be divine providence. I was just listening to some good old pagan heavy metal (Blind Guardian) when I checked this blog. And yes! there is The Good Rev Again, annihilating modern science once again with simple logic that can be understood by any not too smart 10 years old kid. Yes, where does Saturnus get all the energy from? The Grand Old Designer of course. No doubt about it.

  10. @L.Long
    May I humbly suggest that one use the pronoun they, unless one has good reason to believe that there is one and only one of them.

  11. The word is not covered by THEY as I don’t know if it is plural. It could be She or a He or an It or a they but most religions have a singular top dog so S/He/IT And including She and IT is a bit more insulting to a certain group of dims. So no THEY.