McConaghie’s Bathroom Voyeurism Trial Delayed

Creationist voyeurism

Creationist voyeurism

This case just keeps dragging on. It’s about David McConaghie, the creationist preacher and Northern Ireland political operative who was arrested in connection with the discovery of a hidden camera found in the loo of Democratic Unionist Party member David Simpson’s constituency office.

From the first time we reported this, two years ago — see Creationist Suspected of Bathroom Voyeurism — to the long-awaited filing of actual criminal charges (David McConaghie Is Charged With Voyeurism), to McConaghie’s first appearance in court a couple of months ago (David McConaghie Appears in Court), we’ve been waiting for the actual trial to begin.

As we reported in our last post, at McConaghie’s recent court appearance the judge granted an eight week continuance. That time has run, so we’ve been expecting the trial to start any day now, but we have some disappointing news.

In the News Letter, located in Belfast, the oldest English-language newspaper in the world still in publication, we read Voyeurism case against MP’s former advisor adjourned again. Here are some excerpts, with bold font added by us:

The voyeurism case against a former church minister and advisor to an MP has been adjourned for eight weeks.

Why the additional delay? We still don’t know whether McConaghie is actually guilty of the perverted conduct of which he’s been accused, but we’ve been eagerly following this case because it seems to us that this kind of thing provides a unique insight into the minds of creationists. We’ve reported about several other cases that seem to support our hypothesis, but this case is the biggie. Ah well, back to the news story:

A prosecuting lawyer told Craigavon Magistrates’ Court the PPS [the Public Prosecution Service for Northern Ireland] had received the police file of the investigation into the alleged activities of 49-year-old David McConaghie.

That should be routine stuff. It doesn’t explain the reason for another eight week delay. Let’s read on:

Initially charged last September, the PPS had asked for a two-month adjournment at that stage, granted them after it was described by the judge as a “complicated case.”

How complicated can it be? Was it McConaghie’s camera or not? If it were his, did he plant it in the loo? We’ve seen other cases like this. The camera usually has pics of the defendant himself aiming the device to make sure it’s functioning properly — for the intended purpose. And the, ah, fruits of the clandestine device are often found stored on the defendant’s computer. It shouldn’t have been terribly difficult to search for that kind of evidence here. If it exists, it’s already in the police file, and the prosecutors have had it for at least two months. They shouldn’t need yet another two months to put their case together. The story continues:

On Wednesday District Judge Paul Copeland granted a similar extension to January and released McConaghie on continuing bail.

No reason is given. Here’s more:

As part of his bail conditions McConaghie is barred from contacting any staff member at the DUP advice office in Portadown and from owning or possessing any mobile phone or other device “capable of making video recordings”.

We already knew that. Does the story have any other news? No, it doesn’t. So all we can do is repeat our usual advice: Avoid using the bathrooms in any creationist location — that includes creationist politicians, creationist “think tanks,” creation museums and theme parks, and the church buildings of creationist denominations.

Copyright © 2014. The Sensuous Curmudgeon. All rights reserved.

add to del.icio.usAdd to Blinkslistadd to furlDigg itadd to ma.gnoliaStumble It!add to simpyseed the vineTailRankpost to facebook

. AddThis Social Bookmark Button . Permalink for this article

4 responses to “McConaghie’s Bathroom Voyeurism Trial Delayed

  1. Our Curmudgeon enjoins us to

    Avoid using the bathrooms in any creationist location — that includes creationist politicians, creationist “think tanks,” creation museums and theme parks, and the church buildings of creationist denominations.

    …But…but…if we can’t use the bathrooms at such establishments, where are we supposed to puke?!

  2. Somebody is eventually going to say it—so I might as well be the one. Here goes:

    Think about it. This could be the most ironic reversal of debate strategy in the history of creationism. Or at least it’s an instance of the creationist depending on the same words but used in a different order and more effectively. Now listen to me carefully while I explain:

    After all these years of creationists going into debates with nothing but personal convictions and naked arguments, consisting of nothing but empty rhetoric in lieu of evidence, a creationist finally comes along and just might win the most important debate in his life—all because his attorney’s rhetoric basically consists of the argument that the camera evidence from the loo came up empty and that they can convict him of nothing. To put it more bluntly, unless someone proves that the creationist liked to get naked while watching through his camera in the loo, he comes out without any convictions!

    All joking aside, I want to get strictly serious for a moment. While I admit to making a lot of jokes about what clearly are the most cherished beliefs and heartfelt, personal convictions of young earth creationists, the fact remains that nobody has more convictions than Kent Hovind.

    In fact, few non-creationists even come close.

    (c) 2014. Professor Tertius and the Bible.and.Science.Forum
    All rights undeserved.

  3. Megalonyx says: “Insanely off topic: Peru investigates deaths of 500 sea lions.”

    An outrage!