David McConaghie — Guilty!

Creationist voyeurism

Creationist voyeurism

The trial we wrote about and described yesterday — see David McConaghie Trial — What Will Happen? — has concluded.

We present some excerpts from Ex-DUP adviser guilty of voyeurism by hiding camera in constituency office toilets in the Belfast Telegraph, which has the largest circulation of any newspaper in Northern Ireland. They don’t seem to have a comments feature. The bold font was added by us:

A disgraced aide to a DUP MP [Democratic Unionist Party Member of Parliament] faces up to six months in jail after he was convicted of voyeurism today. Standing in the dock of Craigavon Magistrates Court with his hands clasped in front of him, 50-year-old David McConaghie showed little or no reaction as District Judge Mervyn Bates said he had no doubt he “secreted” the sophisticated spy camera in a pot pourri in the toilets of David Simpson’s constituency office for his own sexual gratification.

Frankly, dear reader, because of McConaghie’s political connections and his career as a preacher, your Curmudgeon wasn’t expecting that result. We are pleased to see that reality denial has its limits, and in extreme circumstances, creationists can be shamed into abandoning one of their own. Then we’re told:

The judge told McConaghie his crime was aggravated by numerous factors including that the act represented a breach of the trust places in him by others who worked in David Simpson’s Upper Bann constituency office, the length of time it was carried out and that it was a “deliberate attempt to observe someone that you knew well carrying out a private act.”

Judge Bates being satisfied “beyond reasonable doubt,” he convicted McConaghie, from Cottage Hill, Dollingstown, of the single charge of voyeurism on dates between August 22 and September 13, 2012 in that for the purposes of sexual gratification, he recorded another person doing a private act knowing that the other person did not consent.

What about sentencing? Let’s read on:

Releasing McConaghie on continuing bail, the judge adjourned passing sentence for five weeks and ordered probation pre-sentence reports. He told McConaghie, a onetime prominent Orangeman and church minister, that depending on what sentence he passes, he may have to sign the police sex offenders register “for at least five years.”

How did the convicted pervert react? No surprise there:

Moments later as McConaghie left the court, he continued with his silence, refusing to comment on his conviction or to even offer an apology to his victim.

The news article then gives a lurid account of the evidence against McConaghie, which we’ve discussed before and won’t repeat here, but if you’re not familiar with it and want to see how a creationist conducts such loathsome deeds, then you’ll want to read that material.

But what about the defense objection that the videos weren’t proven to be for McConaghie’s sexual gratification? Here’s what the Belfast Telegraph reports:

Defence barrister Michael Tierney had argued that the case should be dropped, submitting there was no evidence that McConaghie had placed the secret camera in the toilet for sexual gratification despite the police searching his home and trawling through his internet history. On Wednesday however, Judge Bates dismissed that application, telling the court there was “absolutely no evidence” of it being there for any other purpose.

The application having been dismissed, it was at that stage that McConaghie could have taken the witness box to provide some other explanation but having consulted with the pervert, Mr Tierney said he was “exercising his right” not to and confirmed that he had been advised regarding potential adverse inferences to be drawn from his silence.

Observe, dear reader, now that he has been convicted, the newspaper refers to McConaghie as a “pervert.” And so do we.

So there you are. The sentencing will be five weeks from now — near the end of September or the beginning of October. We’ll be watching.

And once more, we remind you of the advice we’ve been giving whenever such cases come to our attention: Avoid using the bathrooms at any creationist organization — that includes creationist politicians, creationist “think tanks,” creation museums and theme parks, and the church buildings of creationist denominations.

Copyright © 2015. The Sensuous Curmudgeon. All rights reserved.

add to del.icio.usAdd to Blinkslistadd to furlDigg itadd to ma.gnoliaStumble It!add to simpyseed the vineTailRankpost to facebook

. AddThis Social Bookmark Button . Permalink for this article

16 responses to “David McConaghie — Guilty!

  1. Sic semper peerers-on-us!

  2. It is to be hoped that his prison cell will be fitted with a tamper-proof 24/7 CCTV surveillance camera…

  3. michaelfugate

    with a YouTube feed….

  4. This seems to be a good example of viewpoint discrimination. No doubt the Discoveroids will soon have something to say about it.

  5. BBC coverage includes the ‘smoking gun’ video footage of McConaghie installing his camera in the pot-pourri (or the ‘no popery’): Ex-DUP adviser David McConaghie found guilty of filming colleague for sexual gratification

  6. The only way the Discoveroids would ever mention this case is if they can figure a way to claim it is all Darwin’s fault. I’m sure they could spin some appropriate sophistry to that effect, if they put whatever they have in place of their minds to it.

    In fact, doing so should be suggested to them as their very own bespoke ‘Curmudgeon Creative Challenge.’

  7. Megalonyx says: “The only way the Discoveroids would ever mention this case is if they can figure a way to claim it is all Darwin’s fault.”

    That’s easy enough. Despite his godly creationism, he was tainted by the omnipresent Darwinism of our times, and so he became a victim of animalistic lust. It’s all Darwin’s fault.

  8. michaelfugate

    No Darwin! No toilet cams!

  9. I don’t get it? He would prefer to look at half or some what naked normal women when there is really good porn dvds with great looking women to be had!

  10. L. Long, hey, I’m not going to judge what makes a man happy, unless it involves lack of consent as this does. It takes all kinds. Yes, even that kind. That one too. And that one.

  11. If you haven’t read “Jesus and Mo”“, you really should.

  12. I know I was told as a child that it isn’t nice to laugh at somebody when they get in trouble, but I am much older now and it is FUN to laugh at critters like this McConaighe. I was also taught that if you do the crime, you do the time. Here’s hoping he gets a long sentence in jail/prison AND have to register as a sexual predator/offender.
    I absolutely agree with Ted above, DO check out Jesus and Mo today.

  13. There’s a certain cruel pleasure to be had from watching an obnoxious creationist put through the wringer, but it’s rather beside the point. If McConaghie were a prominent defender of evolution who had done exactly the same things, he’d still be a pervert.

  14. L.Long marvels that McConaghie

    would prefer to look at half or some what naked normal women when there is really good porn dvds with great looking women to be had!

    That is far too rational a consideration to be applied to an irrational Creationist.

    I suspect that such voyeuristic perversions are little to do with normal human libidinous drives but are far more about a psychopathic need to exert power and control over others–which, after all, is what the whole theocratic enterprise that is Creationism is all about.

  15. Megalonyx, yeah, it’s about the violation of privacy and the control aspect, which is icky as all heck.

    And, to the others, I have Jesus & Mo on my daily webcomic check, so I’d seen that one. As usual, the last panel’s the best one.