Florida and Louisiana Creationism News

Our friends at the National Center for Science Education (NCSE) have posted two items at their website. We’ll discuss them both, adding a bit of bold font for emphasis. Their first is Antiscience bills die in Florida. They say:

House Bill 899 and Senate Bill 1018 both died in committee on March 11, 2016, when the Florida legislature adjourned. Ostensibly aimed at empowering taxpayers to object to the use of specific instructional materials in the public schools, the bills were promoted by groups with a record of objecting to the treatment of evolution and climate change in textbooks … .

We wrote about those bills back in December — see Florida Creationism: New Bills for 2016. The two bills were identical, except that one was in the Florida Senate, and the other in the House. The House bill was sponsored by Ray Pilon, a retired law enforcement officer. The Senate bill was sponsored by Alan Hays, a retired dentist. Back in 2008, when he was a member of the House, he sponsored a companion bill to go along with the Senate’s creationism bill sponsored by rapturous Ronda Storms.

NCSE reports, and the legislature’s website confirms, that both bills died in committee. Florida hasn’t been much fun for us since rapturous Ronda retired.

Now for the Louisiana news. NCSE’s post is Louisiana to repeal 1981 creationist law?. Don’t get excited, dear reader. It’s not about the infamous Louisiana Science Education Act, a flamingly creationist law modeled after the Discoveroids’ Academic Freedom bill, which was passed almost unanimously in 2008 by the then Democrat dominated legislature, and it was eagerly signed by Governor Bobby Jindal. That thing is still alive and well, despite several attempts to repeal it (none this year, so far). Regarding the new bill, NCSE says:

[This is] Claitor’s third attempt to repeal the law. In 2013, his amendment to Senate Bill 205 to repeal the 1981 law was approved by the Senate — despite the opposition of Ben Nevers (D-District 12), the senate sponsor of the so-called Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008,

NCSE is talking about another effort by Republican Senator, Dan Claitor, to do the same thing we wrote abut two years ago in Louisiana Keeps “Equal Time for Creationism” Law. It’s the law that was declared unconstitutional in Edwards v. Aguillard, back in 1987. The creationist legislature is keeping it on the books so they can use it again in case the Supreme Court changes its mind. As we said before about Claitor’s earlier bill, it’s an attempt to empty the historical trash bucket; but Louisiana likes its trash. There really is no hope for that state.

Does Claitor’s new bill have a chance? Probably not. You can read it at the legislature’s website: Senate Bill 156. It’s very short, and it just says that the existing section of law providing “Balanced Treatment for Creation-Science” is repealed. You can follow its progress here. At the moment, his bill is sitting in the Senate’s Committee on Education. If the past is any guide, it’ll die there.

The Louisiana legislature convened today, and it’s scheduled to adjourn on 06 June. There’s still time for another attempt to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008. We’ll be watching.

Copyright © 2016. The Sensuous Curmudgeon. All rights reserved.

add to del.icio.usAdd to Blinkslistadd to furlDigg itadd to ma.gnoliaStumble It!add to simpyseed the vineTailRankpost to facebook

. AddThis Social Bookmark Button . Permalink for this article

5 responses to “Florida and Louisiana Creationism News

  1. Louisiana wants to repeal the repeal? They’re keeping an unconstitutional law on the books just in case it suddenly becomes constitutional? Are they going to reinstate segregation too?

  2. The Greylien

    You`ve yet to show one piece of proof that verifies evolution … just one piece is all it takes but you don`t have that do you ? .. what you have is an idea that is yet to mature … I`ve no belief one way or another but know bull[***] when it`s on show … and your failure to address the creationists stance with anything other than laughter shows you have nothing valid to offer in return.

  3. There are no ‘proofs’ of theories, only evidence. The theory must be consistent with all of the evidence, and the TOE does that, from micro- to macro-evolution.

  4. A. There are many observations of evolution in action, both as it is acting in the wild according to predictions, and under controlled conditions in the lab.
    B. The structure of taxonomy is accounted for uniquely by descent with modification.
    C. Evolution also accounts for the observations of biogeography and many other kinds of observations.
    D. There have been challenges to evolution of which this is just one example: the evolution of the definitive mammalian middle ear requires that a jaw bone of a reptile moves into the middle ear. At some stage there has to be a transitional form which has a doubly articulated jaw. (An example, BTW, of “irreducible complexity”.) And just such fossils have been found in abundance since the1950s. A risky prediction which has been verified.
    E. On the other hand, no one is even attempting to formulate an alternative account for some of the variety of life: What happens so that such-and-such happens in the world of life on Earth, rather than some other possibility. (Why do humans have eyes and four limbs like the other tetrapods, rather than than like insects or octopuses?)

  5. The children’s book “How Whales Walked Into the Sea” explains evolution well enough that my, um, well, children can understand it.