We are amazed at the range of subjects that have been mastered by Ken Ham (ol’ Hambo), the ayatollah of Appalachia, the world’s holiest man who knows more about religion and science than everyone else. He just posted Is Chocolate Going Extinct? Here are some excerpts, with bold font added by us for emphasis:
Better start stocking up! According to a new report [Chocolate May Be Extinct by 2050, According to Scientists], cacao trees — the plants that produce the cocoa beans used to make chocolate — will be extinct by 2050. You can probably guess the “why” behind this prediction: climate change.
If you read the article Hambo cites — in a travel magazine! — you won’t be very impressed. Anyway, he says:
Cacao trees require very precise conditions under which to grow. They will only grow 20 degrees north or south of the equator and need consistent humidity and rainfall. Due to their predictions about a warming climate, scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration believe the areas in West Africa where over half of our cocoa beans are grown will warm by 3.8 degrees F, changing the conditions and possibly making cacao trees go extinct.
“Possibly” making cacao trees extinct. After that he tells us:
It’s interesting that these scientists (most of whom are evolutionists) note that cacao trees are very picky and fragile plants, yet, according to the evolutionary story, they’ve been around nearly 10 million years. So, in this view, they’ve managed to survive several ice ages and other major ecological changes, but a 3.8-degree change will make them go extinct? This is very inconsistent.
Silly scientists! He continues:
Our cultivated cacao trees aren’t nearly as hardy as wild, uncultivated varieties. In selecting for the traits we like in cocoa beans, we’ve weeded out a tremendous amount of genetic diversity. As AiG’s Troy Lacey and Avery Foley wrote about in 2015 [link omitted], some researchers believe tapping into this genetic diversity may make a hardier plant and even yield novel chocolate flavors.
Okay, now what? Let’s read on:
So will cacao trees end up extinct? We don’t know, of course. What we do know is that what you believe about the past determines how you interpret the evidence you study in the present. Those who believe in catastrophic, man-made climate change usually start with an evolutionary view of the past. [The fools!] They believe the climate has been relatively stable since the last ice age, supposedly [Hee hee!] about 12,000 years ago. So even minor climate change, they argue, is alarming and probably man-made.
That’s what the hell-bound evolutionists believe. What does Hambo believe? Here it comes:
Now climate change is real — it’s good observational science. [Huh?] But whether it’s primarily man-made or natural cycles of climate is an entirely different issue. When we start with God’s Word, we recognize we have a climate that was designed “very good” (Genesis 1:31) by God. Of course, just like everything, our climate is cursed and has changed since creation.
Aha — climate change was caused by Adam & Eve. We hadn’t heard that before. Another excerpt:
The global Flood of Noah’s day about 4,350 years ago led to incredible climate change, including the Ice Age that followed the Flood. [Which isn’t in the bible.] Things have been settling down since then, so we expect variations in climate.
And now we come to the end:
Your starting point impacts how you view the world — even when it comes to chocolate!
There you have it, dear reader — Hambo’s view of climate change. Impressive, isn’t it?
Copyright © 2018. The Sensuous Curmudgeon. All rights reserved.