The evidence for the age of the Earth from geology, biology, and astronomy is overwhelming. Nevertheless, creationists disagree — especially Ken Ham (ol’ Hambo) — the ayatollah of Appalachia, the world’s holiest man who knows more about religion and science than everyone else. Hambo just posted this at the website of Answers in Genesis (AIG), his creationist ministry: Matt Walsh and a Young Earth. Here are some excerpts, with bold font added by us for emphasis, and occasional Curmudgeonly interjections that look [like this]:
Recently the popular Catholic political blogger Matt Walsh made a fairly lengthy video [no link provided] explaining why he was not a young-earth creationist and why he thinks young-earth creationists are a stumbling block to the faith of many people. The video is filled with strawman fallacies, misunderstandings, and mischaracterizations of what creationists actually believe. After watching the video, I was left wondering if he had even read any of our literature discussing the age of the earth.
Yeah, how can anyone be truly informed without reading the stuff Hambo puts out? He says:
Walsh’s main points were that the days in Genesis could not be twenty-four hours and that science has proved the earth is billions of years old. [Egad!] We have repeatedly addressed these claims on our website, again making me wonder if he did any research before making his video.
Hambo is furious that his creation science was ignored. He goes on criticizing Walsh:
However, the fundamental point that Mr. Walsh is making is that he is more willing to rely on man’s fallible word than to trust God’s infallible word. [The fool!] He repeatedly cites “science” [Hambo’s scare quotes] as the reason the earth cannot be young. Yet, when observational science is performed, there are mountains of evidence from geology, astronomy, physics, archaeology, and so on that the earth is indeed young.
BWAHAHAHAHAHA! He continues:
By accepting the dogma of secular science [Gasp!], Walsh completely ignores the context of God’s infallible Word. His claim that the days in Genesis cannot be twenty-four hours because a day is defined by the earth revolving around the sun and spinning on its axis reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of what a day is. Though he’s correct to say that the sun, according to Scripture, wasn’t there until the fourth day, the length of the day has nothing to do with the sun. [Hee hee!] It is entirely dependent on the rotation of the earth. [Which isn’t mentioned in the boble.]
So the Earth’s rotation in the dark was sufficient? Right! Let’s read on:
It is very ironic that Walsh regularly defends biblical positions such as biblical marriage, human life made in God’s image beginning at fertilization, two created genders and so on, but rejects the foundation for those beliefs.
That is a bit odd. Another excerpt:
Without appealing to Genesis, there is no foundation for marriage. [But somehow, marriage exists in places that never heard of Genesis.] Abortion becomes perfectly acceptable if we aren’t made in the image of God. Get rid of spare cats or spare kids — what’s the difference? Why should we have two genders if God did not make them male and female in the beginning? [Good question!] Genesis provides the answers to those questions.
Verily, we’d be lost without Genesis. Here’s more:
While Walsh did not mention it, I wonder what he makes of how Jesus affirmed that Genesis was the beginning in Mark 10:6? Or how he feels about Exodus 20:11 which tells us everything was made in six literal days? See, this is the problem with trying to fit billions of years into Genesis. It always ends up compromising the Bible in places outside of Genesis too.
In for a penny, in for a pound. Hambo’s rant goes on:
So either we accept the whole Bible naturally, as it is written, or we reject the whole thing. Trying to fit the Bible with the secular timeline just does not work.
Now that is true. And now we come to the end:
Here at Answers in Genesis, we are committed to answering the questions posed by secularists and compromised Christians about what the Bible says. We have a lot of articles on these topics, some of which are listed below.
He then has links to 17 — yes, seventeen! — AIG articles on young Earth and stuff. You should save that list, dear reader. According to Hambo, you can’t do research without it.
Copyright © 2018. The Sensuous Curmudgeon. All rights reserved.