Hey, Bill Zedler: How About Toilet Cameras?

The world is laughing at Texas legislator Bill Zedler, the creationist who wants to protect intelligent design researchers, and whose latest initiative is an attempt to license strippers (see Texas Creationism: More about Bill Zedler).

The press is covering the news, but their coverage seems laden with snickers. For example, at the website of ABC television station KVUE in Austin, Texas we read: Proposed bill would require licenses for Texas strippers, which says:

State Rep. Bill Zedler (R-Arlington) said the idea is to try and prevent younger women from getting into the industry in the first place. He said it can serve as gateway to other problems, like drugs and prostitution.

A gateway! Here’s more

“At church, my friend’s daughter was attracted to it by the big money of stripping … this isn’t a single case, it’s a pattern,” said Zedler.

It’s a pattern? Based on one girl at his church? One more excerpt:

A license would have to be displayed the entire time a dancer worked a shift.

Presumably, that will block the gateway. But it’s just too easy to joke about this. Instead, we will suggest something useful for Zedler to do with his spare time — of which he seems to have far too much. How about protecting the people of Texas from a genuine danger?

We’re thinking, of course, about toilet cameras, which (as far as we know) are a favorite tool of creationists. See Creationist Suspected of Bathroom Voyeurism, which discusses the unfortunate case of David McConaghie, who — until very recently — was a high-ranking party official of Northern Ireland’s Democratic Unionist Party (the DUP). He was arrested in connection with the discovery of a toilet camera found in the loo of DUP member David Simpson’s constituency office.

McConaghie was also the media officer for the Caleb Foundation, an ultra-creationist lobbying organization that appears to be the ideological brains behind the Democratic Unionist Party. However, it’s reported that he “has voluntarily stepped down from the Caleb Foundation.”

We don’t know, of course, whether McConaghie is guilty. He might not be convicted. The press has been silent lately, so the resolution of this messy business may never be known. Nevertheless, he’s a creationist, so anything is possible.

Hey, if you’re interested in the guy, you can listen to a couple of his sermons here: Sermons by David McConaghie. You may learn something because of his, ah … unique point of view.

But the issue goes far beyond David McConaghie. You may recall that a couple of years ago we posted Ronda Storms and Naked School Boys, about Rapturous Ronda’s desire to spy on what goes on in boys’ locker rooms. She even inspired us to write Ronda Storms, Voyeurism, & the Garden of Eden.

Our point is that Zedler, if he really wants to do something beneficial, can introduce a bill to outlaw toilet cameras and to provide, shall we say, stiff penalties for such behavior. In our humble opinion, that would be far more beneficial than requiring naked ladies to wear a license.

But what if Zedler refuses to act on our suggestion? We know what we’ll think — that he’s eager to regulate harmless gentlemen’s entertainment, but he refuses to outlaw creationist perversion. You, dear reader, may draw your own conclusions.

So how about it, Zedler? Are you determined to harass strippers, while leaving bathroom voyeurs unrestrained?

Copyright © 2013. The Sensuous Curmudgeon. All rights reserved.

add to del.icio.usAdd to Blinkslistadd to furlDigg itadd to ma.gnoliaStumble It!add to simpyseed the vineTailRankpost to facebook

. AddThis Social Bookmark Button . Permalink for this article

10 responses to “Hey, Bill Zedler: How About Toilet Cameras?

  1. retiredsciguy

    Meanwhile, back at the controversy, ….

  2. Follow me on this …

    A licensing system is implemented, making it harder to become a stripper. Meanwhile demand is constant, the competition for strippers among various clubs increases, and wages for strippers increase as a consequence. Higher pay makes stripping more favorable employment for those with the necessary attributes, and competition for jobs increases. Trial competitions for jobs are organized, and word gets around, making these competitions very popular events. Media attention increases, feeding into the cycle as more and more young ladies are attracted into this line of work. “Reality shows” catch on to the hype, and what started as a regional phenomenon becomes the next big media spotlight. Finally realizing the mistake, the stripper-license system is abandoned, but it is too late, for it is not practically an institution. A few year down the road the reality shows have lost their appeal, but Honey-Boo-Boo Gone Wild somehow stays on the air for years. There is now a national stripper-search competition in place far more popular than the Miss-America pageant ever was in it’s heyday. All of this, due to some stupid proposal to license strippers. Who would have thought it?

    And now I have to go bang my head on a a wall until the image of Honey-Boo-Boo Gone Wild goes away.

  3. retiredsciguy

    Please, Curmy, set the blog filters to hold any mention of Honey-Boo-Boo for moderation. Thank you. Thank you very much.

  4. retiredsciguy requests: “Curmy, set the blog filters to hold any mention of Honey-Boo-Boo for moderation.”

    Are you crazy? That’s the top priority now for my news sweeps.

  5. retiredsciguy

    Oh. Well, then — Honey-Boo-Boo, Honey-Boo-Boo, Honey-Boo-Boo, Honey-Boo-Boo, Honey-Boo-Boo, Honey-Boo-Boo, Honey-Boo-Boo, Honey-Boo-Boo, Honey-Boo-Boo, Honey-Boo-Boo, Honey-Boo-Boo, Honey-Boo-Boo!

  6. retiredsciguy

    TA, you owe me a new pair of eyes. I shall never recover.

  7. Awful, isn’t it? I am half expecting a defamation lawsuit from Ms. Boo-Boo later today.

  8. Tomato, by “necessary attributes” you refer of course to an alluring smile.

  9. @Neuroptera Myrmeleontidae-er: Of course. What else could there be?

    I was somewhat disappointed with my results, as it looks like Mr. Luskin’s face is sliding off Ms. Boo-Boo’s head. I rechecked though, and the eyes/mouth/nose from both original images line up quite well in my splice. Ms. Boo-Boo seems to be some sort of mutant.

    @RSG: Sorry about the eyes. I promise not to do any more Honey-Boo-Boo mashups for at least a week.